|
June 2009, Yiorgos Douatzis
This month with great pleasure we welcome a man of art, a poet and novelist, Mr. Yiorgos Douatzis.
---------- “His written speech “stretches to embrace feeling, to initiate the emotion of making a sweet miniature of an illusionary universe, a creation that would be worth living in.” “Yiorgos Douatzis exercises thought into stripping,” as Karouzos said, “laying the poem bare. Make-up, ornaments, jewellery, removed, disposed of; they are just waste to leave the word naked, the word naked of meaning, naked meanings. It does not want to hide behind being poetical, saturated and imponderable. It does not want to hide embarrassed and afraid of the thrills and chills, but instead, to allow them to shine, the voices, the singing". "A poetry which is not derived from the history of poetry as much as from the history of life.” “The words are not used to find other words but to move people who are living and pulsating with life." "Thank you poet for turning us back increasingly to a simplicity that we always miss!”
- Yiorgos Ikaros Bampasakis -
---------- Mr. Yiorgos Douatzis was born in Athens. He studied economics at the High Industrial School of Thessaloniki and sociology at the 8th University of Paris. A journalist since 1974, he has worked in newspapers, magazines, radio and TV stations as a reporter, columnist, political analyst and director. He has taught in Schools of Journalism and has been a speaker at conferences for the media. He has been writing regularly since adolescence and made his first appearance in 1971, in the poetic anthology of the “New Greek Generation” of the editions Agkyra. His second appearance, in performance of ballet, based on the poem "Conflicting Symbols and Progress to Light” in May 1973, G. Tsagaris music and choreography Elli Paraskeva. The below works follow: 1. Written - 1976. ----------
Small 1. When you reach silence you will know. Interview of Mr Yiorgos Douatzis to Mr Lambros Mitropoulos
The pleasure is all mine for this invitation by Radio Art, your welcoming electronic home, this oasis of civilization that we so much need in the difficult times that we live in. I wish you courage and to maintain your faith in the principals and values of aesthetics and life.
It’s a religion without gods and only faith. The scaffold for the building of the noblest system of values. The blessing to be able to fly with a pencil and a piece of paper, to get drunk without alcohol. The tough and ruthless lover. A baton that did never wear out, moist with a thousand human souls. The greatest, the deepest, the great till death passion. I could fill many pages with definitions of poetry but I would never determine its dimensions.
The constant reminding of humanity, of perishability and of mortality. The three “keys” that make us sensible, humble and offering.
Paper descendants. The transfusion of the heart’s burden in white papers. The great breath to keep on route. Singing. Life giving as water, oxygen, blood, fire, earth and sky. As love great and unappeased.
I think that poetry cannot fill in. It pays magically and plunges you in the core of life.
If happiness is the tough fatigue, the straight glance towards the truth that once you embrace it, it may self-contradict, the constant giving and the true love, another way to reach it but through Poetry, there is not.
Happiness is a totally personal concept. For me the combination of holiness (far away from religions), bravery and courageousness could lead to happiness.
His structures that allegedly free him from the modern prisons.
Hope can lead us behind some of the shadows, where there is certainly light, otherwise they would not exist. But why turn away from them? They may be shadows of the present, of the past or of the future. Certainly shadows of a path, of a struggle, of a life. And I do not know a shadow that did not teach me great lessons. Let’s dance with them. We may find the right steps and probably our most fitting pair.
In art and in life, subjectivity exists by default. Both as creator and as a receiver of the work of art, you will act subjectively. As far as the objective criteria are concerned, they are also subjectively defined. In view of a great work of art, where, how and why should you think all the issues of subjectivity or not of the artist or of the art? I recon you prefer to let yourself free in the subjective and greedy sipping of the aesthetic pleasure.
If we talk for the synapse of the truth with the route of man towards his “interest”, namely utility, then things can get hard. But I believe that those people, who have the will, are able to distinguish up to an important level their own truth. The limits in the end are clear. I deeply believe that the true creators do not have such dilemmas. For them the seeking of the each time next truth is the only way. And the utility for them is useless. It kills the essence of things.
No. I am afraid that the enacting of power by the counter-power supporters could be harsher than the one enacted by those who rule.
You obviously talk of the influence of the rich and of the owners of the scientific and technological knowledge, which move the mechanisms of power. But when talking of the power of the true creators, the spiritual people, that produce and offer their work to the world, who may we then take for as weak? The choices define our view of things. How can the alleged powerful ones engulf Homerus, Archilochos, Seferis, Elitis, Leivaditis… How?
The least that philosophy can do, is to exercise our mind. The most that it can do is to lead us to the courage to accept the fluidity of each find and to build a salutary, absolutely personal system of values. I reckon that the saying of our great Axelos, whom I deeply respect, shows his bitterness for the world of today.
I am an optimist by nature. Since man has succeeded to control his animal instincts that make him in-human, may be life can become better. And then again I think how much worse it could be. I think that since you decide to live, you should be optimistic in order for you to fight.
I think of that in relevance to all the things that I have not done yet. And all these are unfortunately too many. Do you think that I try to find excuses to extend my life? (laughter) On the one side I think that I have no time and on the other side I think that no one asked me except for myself to achieve something.
I do not know if accepting reality is considered to be reconciliation. I have accepted that death is an act of life. But the last one. Can you imagine a life without ending? Reproduction would have to stop. We would have a life without birth, creation. I believe that without death we would live the absolute deadlock. Namely a worse death.
The safety (of a roof?) requires recourse, part standstill. Recognition is a big bait, the creaky, unstable roof. Humbleness – and when there is recognition - is the tool that connects the authentic poetic work with the poet’s life. When you conquer humbleness, I believe that no roof is needed. The dome of the highest art is more than enough.
To end with my birth. And to show a flying paper in the wind with the lyrics I wrote when I was eight years old. But who cares about our individual life, when there is real life …
I thank you very much for supporting my work and its diffusion in the internet. I would be very happy if our conversation would touch the soul of at least one of your listeners. Only then our conversation would have a reason for existence. Be always well and creative.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||